To report any issues with the information below please email executivecycle@westberks.gov.uk.

Agenda and minutes

Venue: Roger Croft Room Council Offices Market Street Newbury. View directions

Contact: Moira Fraser 

Items
No. Item

14.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 118 KB

To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of this Committee held on 18 November 2019.

Minutes:

The Minutes of the meeting held on 18 November 2019 were approved as a true and correct record and signed by the Chairman. The Chairman noted that Councillor Peter Argyle had stood down from the Committee and on behalf of the Committee he wanted to wish him well on his recovery. The Chairman welcomed Councillor Hilary Cole as his replacement on the Committee.

 

 

 

 

 

15.

Declarations of Interest

To remind Members of the need to record the existence and nature of any personal, disclosable pecuniary or other registrable interests in items on the agenda, in accordance with the Members’ Code of Conduct.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest received.

16.

Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Fees pdf icon PDF 125 KB

Purpose: To allow Members to consider the responses received during the 28 day statutory consultation period concerning the proposed fees in relation to hackney carriage and private hire licensing.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered a report (Agenda Item 4) which set out the responses received during the 28 day statutory consultation period concerning the proposed fees in relation to hackney carriage and private hire licensing.

Suzanne McLaughlin stated that the fees were discussed at the November 2019 meeting and were then consulted on in accordance with the statutory provisions as set out in section 70 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976. An advert was placed in the Newbury Weekly News on the 12 December 2019. The consultation ended on the 08 January 2020. In addition to the statutory requirement 387 letters were also sent to 158 hackney carriage and 166 private hire drivers as well as 63 private hire operators informing them of the consultation.

The consultation resulted in 28 responses, 26 of which were objections and two were comments related to fees but were matters which fell outside of the consultation. The objections were set out in appendix D to the report. Primarily these queried how the increase could be justified, raised concerns that it was an above inflation increase and was not wanted. In addition to the responses set out in the original paperwork the following additional comments were considered by the Committee:

26

I have looked at the proposals and feel that the new fees that the council wish us to payin  this present economic climate are way too high.

With more taxi companies changing to private hire this put a strain on businesses that are trying to survive.

We are having to fork out more money for training ie. Disability awareness.

Do companies such as Cabco if they are private hire have opertors licences.

No dought we the private hire sector will be penalised for providing an executive service.

27

I am against any large increase I the taxi charges a small yearly increase would be a lot easier for the public to live with. I believe that in the economic situation  as it stands and the political turmoil caused by Brexit this just makes the trade and West Berks council look greedy because any rise for the taxi trade will by association reflect on the council

28

Many thanks for the attached document, However I feel I must object to them in there current form.

 

I refer to the meeting that took place between members of the Licensing team, Licensing Committee and various members of the trade on the 6th August 2019. During that meeting the operator renewal fee structure put forward by the Licensing Dept. was made up, based on 1, 3 and 5 year licences:

 

1 Year licence= 1 X £57 + 1 X £57 for an Operator check. Total Cost £114

3 Year Licence = 1 X £57 + 3X £57 for annual Operator Checks. Total Cost = £228

5 Year Licence = 1 X £57 + 5 X £57 For Annual Operator checks. Total Cost = £342

 

This was the same pricing structure that was proposed to the Committee  ...  view the full minutes text for item 16.

17.

Hackney Carriage Tariff Consultation pdf icon PDF 124 KB

Purpose: To allow Members to consider the responses received during the 28 day consultation period with the trade concerning the proposed tariffs in relation to hackney carriage licensing. The key consideration is the balance between supporting small business and ensuring the general public has access to a good value hackney carriage service across all areas of the District.

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee considered a report (Agenda Item 5) which set out the responses received during the 28 day consultation period with the trade concerning the proposed tariffs in relation to hackney carriage licensing.

 

Suzanne McLaughlin noted that at the meeting on the 18 November 2019 it was agreed that Hackney Carriage Proprietors and Private Hire Operators would be consulted on proposed taxi tariffs following a request received from an operator. The operator had requested a 9% increase on Tariffs 1 and 2 and no increase on Tariff 3. Members had discussed the operator’s proposals and had made some suggested amendments and these were set out in Appendix C to the report. Any amendments had to adhere to section 65 of the local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976.

 

The consultation with the trade ran from the 06 December 2019 to 06 January 2020. All 229 Hackney carriage Proprietors and operators were contacted via a letter.

 

During the consultation period 37 responses were received. One additional response was received that fell outside of the consultation period. 31 of the 38 responses were in favour of the proposals, six wanted no change and one other option was proposed. Additional responses not included in the original paperwork were set out below:

 

Having read the proposals, may I refer to the informal meeting that took place on the 8th August between members of the Committee, Licencing Dept. and Trade where it was suggested and generally agreed on that a new tariff be made simple for everybody to understand. However, what is being proposed doesn’t seem to fit that criteria.

 

Tariff 2 is apparently 1.5 times Tariff 1 Surely 1.5 times £3 is £4.50 not £4 and Tariff 3 at 1.8 times is £5.40 not £5.00 Surely 2 X is simpler, bearing in mind it only affects several days of the year.

 

The physical tariff makes absolutely no sense at all as tariff 2 is definitely not 1.5 X Tariff 1.

 

I suspect that this proposal is either incorrect or designed to confuse the public.

 

Please explain.

 

 I must strongly object to this increase as I feel that in the current economic climate that an increase would potentially kill the trade and risk the jobs of the smaller independent operator / driver.

The last time that we had a fare increase of this magnitude, we saw a significant reduction in trade and an increase in public dissatisfaction. I feel that we will have the same repercussions this time if this proposed increase goes ahead. We don’t want to lose the little business that there is out there.

I feel that the current fare charges are correct and adequate for the size of town that we are. I refer to Billy Drummonds comment that:- a man had recently complained to him, who had taken a taxi two miles on a Sunday evening, and had to pay almost £10. He told Mr Drummond it was a "rip-off".

I would propose that tariffs are altered once per  ...  view the full minutes text for item 17.