To report any issues with the information below please email executivecycle@westberks.gov.uk.
Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber Council Offices Market Street Newbury. View directions
Media
Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies received from
Councillor Richard Somner, and Jenny Graham.
|
2. |
Minutes of the previous meeting 30 September 2024 PDF 272 KB
Minutes:
The minutes of the
previous meeting held on 30 September were accepted as a true and
accurate record.
|
3. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
No Declarations of
Interest were received.
|
4. |
An Overview of the Greenham Trust's Environmental and Social Impact Initiatives
Minutes:
Rob Daniels (Head of
Grants – Greenham Trust) gave a presentation which provided
an overview of the Greenham Trust’s Environmental and Social
Impact Initiatives which can be viewed on the recording:
Environment Advisory Group Open Forum – (25 November
2024)
Rob Daniels was asked a
number of questions and responded as follows:
- The Northcroft Project
would use part of Thames Water’s land as part of the old
railway line.
- Once the towpath works
were complete, the national cycle network would move to the towpath
away from the A4.
- Greenham Trust worked
with youth clubs such as Berkshire Youth and gave funding for them
to support young people and provide opportunities for
them.
- Members noted the
opportunity for community bids, with the deadline at the beginning
of January.
- Greenham Trust already
provided match funding for parish councils’ contributions,
and there was potential for match funding for West Berkshire
Council’s contributions.
- Greenham Trust would need
to work with another non-profit regarding hedge laying. If an
organisation in the local area focussed on hedge laying, Greenham
trust would be able to support it.
- The projects noted in the
presentation were the main projects Greenham Trust were working
on.
- The criteria for a
qualifying project were broad, as long as it was not statutory or a
business, it could be a project, and Greenham Trust would work with
the promoting organisation to attract funding. They would engage
with each project on an individual basis.
- Greenham Trust did not
fund projects in isolation, and focused on getting organisations to
work together, and signposted people to the appropriate
organisation. There were links all over the community.
- Greenham Trust looked for
established communities, with a certain amount of due diligence
before any funding was given. Funding was made as simple as
possible, but a significant amount of background information was
required.
- Historically, most
projects were capital projects. However, given the ongoing cost of
living crisis, revenue projects were being increasingly
considered.
Officers noted that there
were workshops available regarding hedge laying and would forward
them to members.
Action: Officers to provide details of local hedge laying
workshops.
|
5. |
Electric Wallpaper: the Affordable, Low-Carbon Solution for Heating Buildings (Includes a Live Demo)
Minutes:
Ian Sanderson and Matt
Billington (NexGen Heating) gave a presentation on Electric
Wallpaper: The affordable, low carbon solution for heating
buildings, which can be viewed on the recording:
Environment Advisory Group Open Forum – (25 November
2024)
Ian Sanderson and Matt
Billington were asked a number of questions and responded as
follows:
- It was possible for
individual tiles to be heated, with automatic heating available in
zones.
- In the marketplace, the
government needed to address the cost of heating differential
between gas and electric. A consumer was more likely to choose gas
due to the 1 to 4 cost ratio. The heated panels would work with
solar panels and would deliver projects with renewability.
- The Green Levy that was
placed on electricity could be rebalanced, and NexGen was three
times more efficient than a gas boiler.NexGen had customers in
social housing who were saving more with heated tiles because they
were agile heating within the home, by heating in zones.
- If there was a 15% swing
between gas and electricity prices, they would be on par.
- There were multiple case
studies that could be shared with members of the EAG.
- Heat pumps required a
significant upfront investment, and there would be significant
costs of insulation and upkeep. NexGen would not require any
upkeep.
- It would be critical for
pressure to be put on government regarding support for innovative
technologies such as the electric wallpaper.
- It was possible for the
equipment to be installed without professional help.
- For a 2 to 3-bed flat at
40 to 60 sq. ft., it would cost £2,300 to £2,800 as a
capital expenditure, and a similar cost to install the electric
wallpaper.
- NexGen had been in
contact with the Big Issue, in order to train people to install the
electric wallpaper.
- If the project was
successful, there would need to be 10,000 installers by 2030,
installing in 150,000 houses per year. The full cost for installing
the system into a house would be approximately £8000 with
every room working independently, controlled via an app or in the
room, with no maintenance. This compared to heat pump pricing which
could cost £13,500 to purchase and install. All power
collected from a solar panel would not need an inverter, and would
not suffer a 8-12% loss converting from DC to AC.
- The technology needed to
be recognised, which could be a positive influence on EPC rating on
homes.
- NexGen had invested in a
consortium which purchased derelict housing or social housing
unusable in housing stock.
- People should be put
first with health and wellbeing.
- There was a block
regarding lobbies for gas and heat pumps, there were no lobby
groups for SME companies. The government needed to allow councils
to have a toolkit for tackling ongoing heating issues.
- NexGen had received
support from the Welsh Government, and Scottish Government, however
the UK central government was not as supportive.
- NexGen were in a
partnership with EON. Consumers were not buying into the heat pump
even with the funding ...
view the full minutes text for item 5.
|
6. |
Any Other Business
Minutes:
No items were discussed
under any other business.
|
7. |
Exclusion of Press and Public
Minutes:
Members voted to exclude
the press and public and moved into a Part II session.
|