To report any issues with the information below please email executivecycle@westberks.gov.uk.

Agenda item

24/02564/FUL – former stables and garage adjacent to 1 to 3 Stable Cottages, Wallingford Road, Streatley

Proposal:

Demolition of the existing stable and garage, and erection of a new single-storey 2 bedroom dwelling at The Stables at number 3 Stable Cottages

Location:

Former Stables and Garage Adjacent 1 To 3 Stable Cottages, Wallingford Road, Streatley, Reading

Applicant:

Paul Fenton

Recommendation:

To delegate to the Development Manager to GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION subject to conditions.

 

 

Minutes:

1.      The Committee considered a report (Agenda Item 4(1)) concerning Planning Application 24/02564/FUL in respect of the proposed demolition of the existing stable and garage, and erection of a new single-storey 2-bedroom dwelling at The Stables at number 3 Stable Cottages.

2.      Emma Nutchey (Principal Planning Officer) introduced the report to Members, which took account of all the relevant policy considerations and other material planning considerations. In conclusion the report detailed that the proposal was acceptable in planning terms and officers recommended that the Development Manager be authorised to grant planning permission, subject to the conditions outlined in the main report.

3.      In accordance with the Council’s Constitution, Mr Paul Fenton, applicant, addressed the Committee on this application.

Applicant/Agent Representation

4.      Mr Fenton addressed the Committee. This representation can be viewed on the recording: Western Area Planning Committee – 9 July 2025

Member Questions to the Applicant/Agent

5.      Members asked questions of clarification and were given the following responses:

·       The building was of no current use and would not be suitable for commercial storage as it would cause disturbance to neighbouring buildings.

·       The surface water would drain to a soakaway, however, another soakaway could be needed to address the runoff from the roof.

·       The foul drainage would join to the existing sewage connection, which connected to the sewage works to the rear of the property.

Member Questions to Officers

6.      Members asked questions of clarification and were given the following responses:

·       The was no definition on ‘good quality’ regarding residential amenity space referred to in paragraph 6.11 of the report. However, usability contributed to the quality of the space with size and privacy, and sufficient space for functional activities.

·       The parking spaces were within the green area in the middle of the development. It was considered that the parking spaces alone did not undermine the value of the site and were sufficiently small enough that they would not dilute the character of the space.

Debate

7.      Councillor Richard Somner opened the debate by noting that the reasons for the application going before the Committee had been rectified in the report. He noted that the proposal was better than the current use of the property considering it had been redundant for 30 years and would be a benefit to the area.

8.      Councillor Jeremy Cottam believed the site was not overlooked and would make no impact on the surrounding areas. He supported the recommendations from Officers and felt that the parking spaces in the green section of the proposal would be of no detriment to the space.

9.      Councillor Clive Taylor raised no objection to the application and noted it would increase the housing stock in the area.

10.   Councillor Jeremy Cottam proposed to accept Officer’s recommendation and grant planning permission subject to the conditions listed in the main report. This was seconded by Councillor Justin Pemberton

11.   The Chairman invited Members of the Committee to vote on the proposal by Councillor Jeremy Cottam, seconded by Councillor Justin Pemberton, to grant planning permission. At the vote the motion was carried.

RESOLVED that the Development Manager be authorised to grant planning permission subject to the conditions in the main report.

Supporting documents: